
Opinions are running high over a plan to add fluoride to Portland’s water supply in an effort to fight tooth decay and improve public health (photo by MIndy Cooper/The Portland Observer).
Should fluoride be added to our water?
By Mindy Cooper/The Portland Observer
A debate over whether or not fluoride should be added to the public water supply has taken center stage in Portland, after City Commissioner Randy Leonard scheduled a public hearing next week, Sept. 6, with a council vote scheduled less than a week later.
As the second largest city in the country to not have fluoride in its water, Portland also stands out with one of the highest rates of tooth decay among children and adults in the nation.
According to the Oregon Dental Association’s 2007 Oregon Smile Survey, more than 35 percent of Oregon children suffer from untreated tooth decay — more than double the rate in Washington (15 percent) and other neighboring states.
Although poor dental health outcomes can’t be directly pinpointed to the lack of fluoride in the water, many experts believe the missing ingredient is the number one reason for the metro area’s low rank for childhood oral health.
“This public health crisis is having devastating effects on our children, the poor, and the uninsured,” said John Snyder, DMD, dental director and chief executive officer of Permanente Dental Associates.
Access to oral health care is a critical problem for low-income, underinsured, and uninsured families, who are particularly vulnerable to tooth decay and associated health issues, he said. “This reality, coupled with an uninsured rate higher than 40 other states, has created an oral health emergency in Portland and all of Oregon.”
Although Portlanders have voted three times against the fluoridation in the past, Leonard, along with Commissioner Nick Fish and Mayor Sam Adams, have announced their support of the plan, in hopes to decrease the exponentially high level of tooth decay amongst resident children.
The support represents a majority on the Portland City Council.
Community supporters include the Everyone Deserves Healthy Teeth Coalition, which is made up of several groups, including the African American Health Coalition, the Oregon Health and Sciences University American Medical Student Association chapter and the Urban League of Portland, to name a few.
Other residents and activists, however, remain strongly opposed to the plan, which they believe imparts unnecessary health risks and violates an individual’s right to consent to medicinal intake.
The opponents point to numerous studies, which have shown serious, adverse health consequences from fluoride ingestion.
Oregon Citizens for Safe Drinking Water, a non-profit organization, is leading the charge against fluoridation. The group says its goal is to protect the drinking water of all Oregonians through education and advocacy work specifically aimed to keep fluoride compounds and toxic chemicals out of the public drinking supply.
Kimberly Kaminski, the organization’s executive director, calls fluoride a waste product of the phosphate fertilizer industry.
“It contains contaminates, such as lead and arsenic; it is highly acidic and there are concerns about it leeching lead and copper from plumbing,” she said.
The group’s website claims there have been cases of fluoride poisoning found in industrial workers.
According to Kaminski, fluoride treatments have yet to be regulated by the Food and Drug Administration, which comes as a surprise to many residents throughout the country.
She disagrees with the premise that fluoride in the water will help low income families.
“Families and individuals who lack a proper diet that is low in calcium are especially susceptible to the harm of fluoridation,” she said. “The other thing is that low income families don’t have the option of avoiding fluoridated water. They can’t buy bottled water, and transport bottled water—especially if taking public transportation.”
She adds that lower income populations don’t have the option of purchasing expensive filtration systems. “There is not a choice. When you put it in water—all of the water—we swim in it, we bathe in it, and we water our gardens in it.”
She also claims that fluoride would negatively impact salmon and other aquatic species because the compound doesn’t break down, and therefore accumulates in the environment.
“We only drink one percent of it, so 99 percent goes down the drain, where it enters our ecosystem. We know it has toxic effects on aquatic life,” she said.
The benefits of water fluoridation, however, have been known for more than 65 years, said Snyder.
In 1945, Grand Rapids, Mich., added fluoride to its municipal water system, which catalyzed rates of tooth decay in the area’s children to drop dramatically, he said. Since then, hundreds of studies have shown the effectiveness of community water fluoridation in reducing tooth decay.
According to the American Dental Association, evidence shows that water fluoridation reduces tooth decay by 18 to 40 percent, because it strengthens the teeth and protects them from bacteria growth.
According to the Everyone Deserves Healthy Teeth Coalition, dental decay accounts for 30 percent of all health care costs for children, and dental-related emergency room visits by Oregon’s Medicaid enrollees increased 31 percent in the past few years, taking a tremendous toll on healthcare costs.
“Dental decay affects all children, and low-income families and communities of color are hit especially hard,” said Joseph Santos-Lyons of the Asian Pacific American Network of Oregon. “Fluoridated water is the only way to ensure equal protection for all children’s teeth, and it’s safe and beneficial for everyone in our community.”
Still, opinions continue to run high throughout the city.
They say everyone is doing it, but most of the world doesn’t do it, said Kaminski.
Opponents are planning to file a ballot measure to slop the fluoridation effort. A City Council vote on the issue is planned for Sept. 12.


“Debates” are terrible venues to determine public health and social policy. The “winner” generally depends on charisma and propaganda messages as much as dispassionate science, The important debate has gone on in the minds and careers of our medical, dental and public health experts and it is very easy to see where they stand.
see:
http://www.ilikemyteeth.org/fluoridation/respected-organizations/
If the US had debated Civil Rights we’d likely still be back in the 50′s.
Citizens are almost forced into choosing which side to believe.
A search of the National Library of Medicine for fluoridation returns 6,000 hits for “fluoridation” and almost 50,000 for “fluoride.” Many of the key articles are present only in summary form
One needs the entire paper to find that the largest study ever done on school children’s adult teeth (Brunelle and Carlos 1990) found a whopping 60% difference between fluoridated and non-fluoridated town in Oregon’s region. The entire Pacific region when studied was 20% fluoridated as is Oregon today.
People can listen to both sides but in the end will usually just pick their experts, often based on their personal prejudices rather than real science.
You will choose between essentially all dentists, physicians, public health workers and a long list revered societies and institutions like the Am Public Health Assoc, the CDC and OHSU on the pro side and a small handful of energized and politically effective advocates on the neg side.
The baby teeth story is the most compelling benefit.
The huge Louisiana Medicaid study found 2/3rds of the operations for terrible cavities in kids are avoided with community water fluoridation (CWF).
50% of the dental bills for the kids studied were avoided, found money for the Governor’s new Medicaid care system to buy more medical care for poor kids.
Under anesthesia procedures include extractions root canals & stainless steel crowns & cost up to $15,000 and happen more often in PDX without CWF.
Those who oppose CWF harm Portland’s oral health, especially these kids.
A debate implies that there are two valid and credible sides to an issue. For example, if it were high noon and one person said it was day, and the other said it was night, and both were of sound visual acuity, would there be grounds for a debate? Certainly not.
The health benefits of Optimally Fluoridated Community Water has been shown over the last 65 years to be safe, effective, and provide huge cost savings for communities. When a community invests $1 in fluoridation, $38 in dental bills are saved. That’s a huge savings! More importantly, the children and adults that benefit from this safe public health measure are less likely to miss work and school due to pain and suffering from dental decay. That benefit is huge in and of itself!!
Ms. Kaminsky’s often repeated charge that fluoridation chemicals contain lead and arsenic that will affect Portlanders health is sufficiently mistaken to properly be labeled delusional.
The National Sanitation Foundation’s standards which control the purity of fluoride water additives are written right into Oregon Law.
The data on the purity of fluoride additives can be read at:
http://www.nsf.org/business/water_distribution/pdf/NSF_Fact_Sheet.pdf
There you will find that the majority of samples have no detectable levels of the contaminants of concern.
With respect to arsenic, compared to the normal background arsenic levels in food stuffs, the added “burden” of arsenic from fluoridation is trivially tiny. For example, the FDA Total Food Study showed the following food arsenic levels to be:
tuna, canned in oil 980 parts per billion (ppb)
white rice, cooked 65 ppb
pear, raw 8 ppb
and by comparison . .
EPA’s max allowed in water 10 ppb
Max allowed by Std 60 1 ppb
Ave from fluoridation chemicals .12 ppb
So a raw pear has 80 times more arsenic and tuna nearly 10,000 more arsenic that the fluoridation chemicals add to drinking water. People eat these foods everyday without either the slightest concern or slightest harm. The addition of arsenic from fluoridation to the normal background intake is exponentially small by comparison. It is immeasurably small and of no conceivable biologic effect/
By way of perspective: Arsenic has been demonstrated to be an essential nutrient for a number of domestic animals.
It is delusional to argue that the immeasurably small addition from water fluoridation is a real health risk. All of Ms. Kaminsky’s claims have similar elements of either outright mistakes and loopy exaggeration.
The CDC correctly points out that Standard 60 purity standards are far more precise than the USP standards for medications. The USP standard only requires a “total heavy metal” measurement while the NSF requires separate analyses for each one.
see: http://www.cdc.gov/fluoridation/fact_sheets/engineering/wfadditives.htm
With fluoridation $38 is saved in dental bills for adult teeth with every $1 spent. Water fluoridation improves the dental health of all citizens, especially the children.
It is tragic that totally baseless fears such as what you raise with respect to lead and arsenic actually convince voters to oppose one of the most effective public health measures
Because of the Portland Observer’s commitment to cultural diversity, its readers may be interested in the overwhelming support for and membership in the Everyone Deserves Health Teeth Coalition. The list follows and is remarkable for the many organizations representing minority communities and others dedicated to creating better health for everyone.
The Everyone Deserves Healthy Teeth Coalition supports water fluoridation for the city of Portland. Our members represent health, education, social justice, business, and community organizations dedicated to ending Oregon’s dental health crisis. Our position is backed by science and is supported by every major national healthcare organization.
The coalition includes:
African American Health Coalition
African Partnership for Health
African Women’s Coalition
Albina Head Start
Asian Health & Service Center
Asian Pacifc American Network of Oregon (APANO)
Capitol Dental Care
Causa
Center for Intercultural Organizing
Central City Concern
Children First for Oregon
Coalition of Communities of Color
Coalition of Community Health Clinics
Friends of Creston
Children‘s Dental Clinic
Kaiser Permanente Northwest
Component Dental Socities (17)
Familias en Acción
Knowledge Universe
Latino Network
Legacy Health
Lutheran Community Services Northwest
Medical Teams International
Native American Youth Association (NAYA)
Northwest Health Foundation
OEA Choice Trust
OPAL Environmental Justice Oregon
Oral Health Outreach
Oregon Academy of Family Physicians
Oregon Dental Association
Oregon Dental Hygienists’ Association
Oregon Dental Services Companies
Oregon Head Start
Oregon Health & Science University
Oregon Latino Health Coalition
Oregon Latino Agenda for Action
Oregon Medical Association
Oregon Nurses Association
Oregon Oral Health Coalition
Oregon Pediatric Society
Oregon Primary Care Association
Oregon Public Health Association
Oregon Public Health Institute
Oregon School Nurses Association
Oregon School-Based Health Care Network
Pew Center on the States
Philippine American Chamber of Commerce of Oregon
Portland African American Leadership Forum
Providence Health & Services – Oregon
Portland State University
P:ear
Regence BlueCross BlueShield of Oregon
SEIU Local 49
Urban League
Upstream Public Health
Virginia Garcia Memorial Health Center
Willamette Dental
Community Water Fluoridation (CWF) has been one of the most researched and studied subjects ever.
CWF has been recognized by National and International Organizations That Recognize the Public Health Benefits of Community Water Fluoridation for Preventing Dental Decay:
National and International Organizations That Recognize the Public Health Benefits of Community Water Fluoridation for Preventing Dental Decay
World Health Organization
American Cancer Society
American Academy of Pediatrics
American Medical Association
Child Welfare League of America
American Nurses Association
American Osteopathic Association
American Pharmacists Association
March of Dimes Birth Defects Foundation
Alzheimer’s Association
The Children’s Health Fund
Association of Maternal and Child Health Programs
National Down Syndrome Congress
National Down Syndrome Society National Foundation of Dentistry for the Handicapped
National Head Start Association
Canadian Dental Association
Canadian Dental Hygienists Association
Canadian Medical Association
Canadian Nurses Association
Canadian Paediatric Society
American Academy of Family Physicians
American Academy of Nurse Practitioners
American Academy of Pediatric Dentistry
U.S. Public Health Service Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA)
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC)
American College of Physicians–American Society of Internal Medicine American Dental Association
National Dental Hygienists’ Association
National Health Law Program
National Healthy Mothers, Healthy Babies Coalition
Academy of Dentistry
InternationalAcademy of General Dentistry
Academy for Sports Dentistry
America’s Health Insurance Plans
American Academy of Oral and Maxillofacial Pathology
American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons
American Academy of Periodontology
American Academy of Physician Assistants
American Association for Community Dental Programs
American Association for Dental Research
American Association for Health Education
American Association for the Advancement of Science
American Association of Endodontists
American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons
American Association of Orthodontists
American Association of Public Health Dentistry
American Association of Women Dentists
American College of Dentists
American College of Preventive Medicine
American College of Prosthodontists
American Council on Science and Health
American Dental Assistants Association
American Dental Education Association
American Dental Hygienists’ Association
American Dietetic Association
American Federation of Labor and Congress of Industrial Organizations
American Hospital Association
American Legislative Exchange Council
American Public Health Association
American School Health Association
American Society for Clinical Nutrition
American Society for Nutritional Sciences
American Student Dental Association
American Water Works Association
Association for Academic Health Centers
Association of American Medical Colleges
Association of Clinicians for the Underserved
Association of State and Territorial Dental Directors
Association of State and Territorial Health Officials
Association of State and Territorial Public Health Nutrition Directors
British Fluoridation Society
Canadian Public Health Association
Children’s Dental Health Project
Chocolate Manufacturers Association
Consumer Federation of America
Council of State and Territorial Epidemiologists
Delta Dental Plans Association
FDI World Dental Federation
Federation of American Hospitals
Hispanic Dental Association
Indian Dental Association (U.S.A.)
Institute of Medicine
International Association for Dental Research
International Association for Orthodontics
International College of Dentists
National Association of Community Health Centers
National Association of County and City Health Officials
National Association of Dental Assistants
National Association of Local Boards of Health
National Association of Social Workers National Confectioners Association
National Council Against Health Fraud
National Dental Assistants Association
National Dental Association
Oral Health America
Robert Wood Johnson Foundation
Society for Public Health Education
Society of American Indian Dentists
Special Care Dentistry
Academy of Dentistry for Persons with Disabilities
American Association of Hospital Dentists
American Society for Geriatric Dentistry
The Dental Health Foundation (of California)
U.S. Department of Defense
U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs
National Institute of Dental and Craniofacial Research (NIDCR)
World Federation of Orthodontists
Groups that recognize the OPPOSITION to CWF:
NONE.
http://www.AnInconvenientTooth.org
September 7, 2012
Open letter to Sam Adams, Randy Leonard, Nick Fish, Amanda Fritz and Dan Saltzman – Members of the Portland city council.
Hello Sam, Randy, Nick, Amanda, and Dan,
I have directly handed to each of you (except Nick who left the meeting earlier than I expected) flyers for my new documentary film called “An Inconvenient Tooth”. Thank you Sam and Amanda for telling me that you thought it had a great title.
I would like ask each of you one simple yes or no question. That question is whether or not you intend to watch this film in full before voting on water fluoridation on September 12th. I want to know whether or not you are going to take the time to watch this film before voting on something that will affect almost a million people, many or most of which do not want fluoride added to their water as they have expressed 3 times in public votes on the issue. I would like to know if you are going to honestly listen to the opposition before voting to fluoridate Portland area water for the first time in history.
Please answer “yes” or “no” as soon as you can. If you choose not to answer I will assume the answer is no.
You can view the film at http://www.AnInconvenientTooth.org
Thank You,
Guy Wagner
Portland, OR
Portland is sooo behind the times! Fluoride is a necessity! Come on Portland WAKE UP!