Move Over for Luxury
Trend sees older housing stock leveled for higher-cost living
Colin Staub | 6/18/2014, 1:08 p.m.
North and northeast Portland have experienced a number of changes in the past few years adding to the gentrification of local neighborhoods. It’s easy to see the increased density, the changing neighborhood demographics, and, perhaps most apparent for the average resident, rising housing costs.
While there are many components to each of these changes, a recent development trend of demolishing older single-family housing properties and splitting them up to make room for multiple luxury homes and condos has contributed to all of them and more.
Records from recent real estate transactions in the relatively low and medium income Humboldt Neighborhood of north and northeast Portland, for example, show homes on single family lots that were assessed in the $200,000 range being divided into two or more lots and replaced with luxury homes in excess of $500,000 each.
“We used to do probably 95 percent restorations, 5 percent new construction,” says Mike Hubbell, founder and managing member of Portland Development Group, a residential real-estate development company. “Now it’s probably about 70 percent new constructions, 30 percent restorations.”
There are several factors at work in the demolition and infill increase, and cost is a major player. Hubbell cites the Urban Growth Boundary as one factor in the rising demolitions.
“When you’re not allowed to move out, to push the city limits out, [it’s] driving up the prices,” says Hubbell. “It’s a less viable option to restore a house, versus remove it and put two homes on it.”
However, finances are not the only factor in the increase in new construction.
“Restoration is a very hard, very highly expertise-driven business,” says Hubbell. “What makes new construction so attractive is that a lot of contractors can do it. It’s easy, it doesn’t take a lot of expertise.”
Regardless of the reasons behind the trend, the demolition increase has some Portland residents worried.
“People are concerned with demolitions about a wide variety of issues,” says Shoshana Cohen, executive director of the Northeast Coalition of Neighborhoods.
Cohen cites environmental impacts —such as demolitions that spread lead paint and asbestos into the air — issues around sustainability in demolishing something that’s a perfectly good house, and changes in the character of the neighborhood, as issues neighbors have expressed concern about.
“Affordability is one area people are concerned about as well,” says Cohen. “We are hearing concerns from a wide variety of people, about smaller, older, often more affordable houses being demolished and replaced by often much larger, more expensive houses.”
Portland State University planning professor Lisa Bates has been involved in public policy conversations surrounding gentrification, and sees the demolition increase playing a role in that process.
“I think that is a pretty apparent manifestation of that whole phenomenon, at least in North and Northeast, with the market rising and a lot of pressure,” she says.
Bates sees many of the issues surrounding housing in north and northeast Portland as linked by the common theme of gentrification, which will continue, she says, “as long as we have a system that’s driven by an imperative of property values and making more money for property.